AX Check grades how far a coding agent can get with your product. It inspects your site, then has three agents try to onboard end to end, and returns concrete guidance on what to fix in your docs, marketing site, CLI, MCP server or Skills files. A public leaderboard ranks products by grade.
Be the first to rate AX Check. Your feedback helps other users decide.
Let three agents attempt a real signup-to-first-call flow and watch where they stall.
Turn vague complaints about agent usability into a list of pages and endpoints to fix.
Compare your grade with other developer products on the public leaderboard.
Similar tools in the same category — compare side-by-side
Jeff is a read-only command line code review tool from Alurith, written in Go, that uses Jev decisio...
InstinctFlash is a high-performance serving runtime for robotics models from General Instinct. It ta...
Engrams is an open-source alternative to Devin from Cortex Apps: an AI software factory for the ente...
Guides and comparisons about code tools
Eight Show HN projects that check what an agent actually built: runtime verdicts, agent onboarding audits, semantic review and in-loop evaluation.
Ten Show HN projects for running several agents at once: orchestrators, subagents in isolated worktrees, shared memory trees and browser relays.
Eight Show HN projects that handle the unglamorous layer: consumer-GPU serving, remote tensors, vector-ready storage, semantic layers and agent payments.
Which AI coding assistant actually saves you time? GitHub Copilot vs Cursor vs Codium in 2026, with real comparison and recommendations by use case.
How to choose an AI coding tool in 2026: inline completion, repo chat, and local privacy, compared across Copilot, Cursor, Codeium, and more.
